The operator of Vessel one (1) was traveling South on the Jordan River and the Operator of vessel two (2) was traveling North. Both vessels were involved in a head-on collision. Looking at the damage to the vessels suggests that vessel two (2) at some point took evasive action to cut in front of vessel one (1). The operator/passenger of vessel did not report of any injuries during the investigation. The couple later reported that further damages was done to their vessel that occurred below the waterline that was not visible at the scene. occupant also later advised that she was having lower back pain as a result of sprain/strain.  Operator1 stated freely that he had consumed one and a half alcoholic beverages which was Abita brand beer.He then agreed to take a field sobriety test administered by Officers Herring and Hicks. 

The Officers then traveled to Gulfport Memorial Hospital to interview the subject(s) of Vessel II. The Operator of Vessel II wasidentified  who suffered multiple injuries. Offiecrs were not able to obtain a statement for him due to being  incapacitated. So Officers question wife and left with her a boating accident form for Operator2 to complete.Upon Operator2 release from the hospital the boating forms were complete and turned into the Officer. All statements and photographs were taken at the scene and damages to the vessels and persons involved were analyzed by investigating officers. After review of the evidence suggests that the collision/accident was a result of operator error from both parties involved.
Kiln                          