RedactedNarrative: For the purpose of this report, "Incline 1" refers to the narrow strip pit which runs north/south and "Incline 2" refers to the narrow strip pit which runs east/west, ending on the west side at Incline 1.
  
  The following is a summary of the incident, based on initial interviews with both boat operators, and is not verbatim.
  
  On 06/01/21 at approximately 5:48pm, two recreational vessels were approaching the T intersection of the two Inclines at the same time, on plane, traveling approximately 15-20 mph.  VESSEL 2, which was heading northbound on Incline 1, was hugging the inside of the channel and slowing down in anticipation of turning east onto Incline 2.  
  
  VESSEL 1, which was heading westbound from Incline 2, turning south into Incline 1.  The operator of VESSEL 2, in noticing VESSEL 1 approaching head on, gave way to the starboard side.  VESSEL 1 continued directly at them, striking the port side of VESSEL 2.  
  
  VESSEL 1 went airborne, going over the top of VESSEL 2.  The passenger from VESSEL 1 was ejected from the boat, subsequently losing the inflatable PFD he was wearing upon entering the water.  Upon returning to the water, VESSEL 1 made a sharp turn and struck the east bank of Incline 1.
  
  The passenger of VESSEL 2, upon hearing the ejected passenger from VESSEL 1''s calls for help, stating "I CAN''T SWIM", entered the water voluntarily to secure the subject, so he could be pulled into VESSEL 2 by the operator.
  
  All parties involved refused medical treatment.  The operator of VESSEL 2 stated his shoulder was sore but was already feeling better.  The operator of VESSEL 1 displayed superficial scratches on his right elbow.  The passenger of VESSEL 1''s knee was noticeably very swollen, but did not appear to affect his ability to walk.  This passenger was offered medical multiple times, but stated he lived about 5 minutes from the hospital, so if it got worse, he could go have it checked out at a later date.
  
  On 06/21/21, I drove to the operator of VESSEL 1''s residence, at which time he reiterated the fact that upon noticing VESSEL 2, he turned to the left in an attempt to avoid a collision, as he did not have the ability to give way to the right.  He "Unlawful head on passing- not giving way right".  Enforcement action documented on field report supplement "2021-2-502-009Bs1".
  
  Although neither operator as able to assign a monetary repair estimate of their vessels, it is assumed both vessels would be a total loss.  Damage estimates are based on a Google search of the used sale prices of similar vessels.
  
  
  
  NOTHING FURTHER TO REPORT.  CASE CLOSED.  EVIDENCE CLOSED.
  