RedactedNarrative: Two personal watercraft (PWCs) were involved in the collision and both were on trailers at Best Jetz Rental.  I made contact with Operator1.  Operator1 said he was the operator and sole occupant of his PWC(Vessel 1, V1).  I checked V1 for damage and identified minor rub rail damage and paint transfer to the port side of the bow.  Damage was estimated at $300.  Photographs were taken of V1 (attached).
  
  I contacted operator2 who indicated she was the operator and sole occupant of her PWC.  I checked V2 for damage and identified a hole and cracks in the starboard side toward the stern of the PWC, fiberglass damage on the rear starboard corner, and damage to the HIN plate.  Damage was estimated at $6000.  Photographs were taken of V2 (attached).
  
  Operator1 stated that he was operating V1 southbound and V2 was in his blind spot to his left.  V2 passed him and they made contact which knocked him off of V1.  Operator1 reported that he was traveling at approximately 20-25 mph when the collision occurred.
  
  Operator1 completed a witness statement and illustration (attached).
  
  Operator1 stated he did not have any injuries.
  
  Operator2 stated that she was operating V2 southbound, just north of Riverside Resort, and she slowed down as she passed V1 with V1 on her right side.  She stated that as she passed V1, V1 turned into her, hit V2 and her foot, and knocked her off of V2.  Operator2 reported that she was traveling less than 30 mph when the collision occurred.
  
  Operator2 completed a witness statement and illustration (attached).
  
  Operator2 stated that her right ankle and knee were sore and swelling but refused medical treatment.
  
  Damage appeared consistent with a collision on the starboard side of V2. It appeared as though V1 had struck V1''s port side bow on the rear starboard side of V2 causing fiberglass damage to V2.  V1 then continued into the starboard side of V2 cracking and putting a hole in the fiberglass of V2.  This action also caused rub rail damage and paint transfer to the port side of the bow on V1. 
  
  Based on statements and damage it is not possible to determine which operator converged on the other or if both operators converged on each other.  Damage identified on both vessels indicate that V1 was the impacting vessel and V2 was the impacted vessel, showing Operator1 operated from behind and into V2, therefore, Operator1 is found at fault.