RedactedNarrative: On 08/14/2022 at approximately 1602 hours, I was on patrol near the 10 Lane Boat Ramp at Lake Pleasant, Arizona. It should be noted there was a large storm with heavy winds and waves approximately two feet high at the time.  
  
  Multiple boat collisions were reported within a short time of this incident. 
  
  I was approached by a male subject. Subject1 indicated he was involved in a boat collision and wanted a report. Subject1 indicated the following to me during the course of my investigation:
  Subject1 had docked his boat on the east side of the east boat dock and went up to get his vehicle. Subject1 was advised another boat had bowed into his boat breaking the window. The other boat then spun around and the rear of that boat hit a wave causing it to come out of the water and land on the back of his boat. The boat then left the scene back into the lake. 
  
  Subject1 showed me the damage to his boat. Subject1''s boat is a 20 foot 1994 Rinker. The boats Port side window had been broken with a impact that was consistent with a boat bow. There was also two scrapes on the rear of the boat, and the rub guard on the port side of the aft of the boat was broken. Subject1 indicated approximately $1500 in damage but was unsure of an exact amount and estimated. 
  
  Subject1 had two occupants of the boat who were uninjured. 
  
  Subject1 was unsure where the other boat had left to but believed it went back into the main bay. 
  
  Subject1 was provided the report number. 
  
  I was later dispatched to the 10 Lane Boat Ramp due to the run boat showing up. At approximately 1735 hours, I arrived on scene and observed a white, blue and black boat. Deputy was already on scene talking to both parties. 
  
  I walked around the boat and observed a large amount of damage to the boat. On the very tip of the bow I observed damage including chips and paint transfer consistent with colliding with Subject1''s boat. 
  
  I also looked at picture Subject1 had been sent of a male subject with arm tattoos on boat. This subject did not match the description of the boat owner. 
  
  I then spoke to the owner of the boat who identified himself. V1 owner indicated the following to me during the course of my investigation:
  V1 owner had docked the boat and walked up the boat ramp to get his truck. V1 owner had left a female on the boat with whom he was on a first date. V1 owner had left his vehicle keys with another deputy and when he returned, V1 owner saw his boat colliding with rocks on the shore. 
  
  V1 owner indicated that he did not have any male subjects on the boat and was unsure who the subject was in the picture. 
  
  V1 owner also pointed out a broken rope on the starboard side of his boat. 
  
  Deputy also spoke to the two female''s on Subject1''s boat who were unsure if V1 owner was on the boat or not at the time of the collision. 
  
  V1 owner provided his insurance information to me and I provided it to Subject1. 
  
  V1 owner showed me a large amount of damage primarily on the starboard side, under the boat, and to the prop and skag of his boat. There was also the damage on the bow of the boat. V1 owner indicated this would cost approximately $3000 to repair but was unsure. 
  
  At this time there is no evidence to prove V1 owner was the operator at the time of the incident or if he was even aware of his boat colliding with Subject1''s. 
  
  Both parties were provided the report number.
  
  Pictures were taken of both boats and uploaded to Evidence.com. 
  
  My body camera was activated while in contact with the public. 
  
  Nothing further to report at thi...
  