RedactedNarrative: On August 28th, 2021 at approximately 1800 hrs CST I, Officer 1, was notified by KSP Post 15 of a boating accident at the Jamestown Marina Ramp involving two boats. Upon my arrival Vessel 1, a 24 ft 2021 Benninton Tritoon operated by V1 Operator was docked at the temporary docking and Vessel 2, a 2005 28 ft Eliminator operated by V2 Operator was trailered sitting on the ramp access. Three occupants (V1 Passenger 1, V1 Passenger 3, and V1 Passenger 2) on Vessel 1 at the time of the accident stated that they were leaving the dock to wait to be loaded onto the trailer when Vessel 2 cut them off causing Vessel 1 to strike Vessel 2 in the starboard stern and rear starboard side. I could smell the odor of an alcoholic beverage so field sobriety was conducted on the operator, V1 Operator, of Vessel 1 but no clues of impairment were present. I then spoke to 2 occupants (V2 Passenger 2 and V2 Passenger 1), the operator (V2 Operator) and the owner of Vessel 2. All occupants on Vessel 2 stated that they were idling towards their trailer when the operator of Vessel 1 pushed the throttle too hard causing her vessel to accelerate quickly striking their vessel causing damage. An odor of an alcoholic beverage was present so I conducted field sobriety on the operator, V2 Operator, at which time no clues of impairment were present. Both vessels had all required safety equipment onboard. No injuries occurred as a result of this accident.
  
  	Damage Assessment
  
  Vessel 1 (2021 Bennington Tritoon) sustained scratches to the starboard side bow toon that were approximatley two feet by two feet.
  
  Vessel 2 (2005 Eliminator) sustained damage to the starboard side stern that penetrated the fiberglass approximately two feet in length.
  
           Summation of Findings
  
  Upon viewing the damage sustained by both vessels as well as the statements given by parties on both vessels involved it appears as if the operator of Vessel 1 failed to adhere to Proper Lookout (33 CFR 83 Rule 5) and Actions to Avoid Collision (33 CFR 83 Rule 8) by not observing for other vessels while releasing their mooring lines and getting underway.  Had a proper lookout been utilized the releasing of the mooring lines and moving of the vessel would have allowed for the danger of the passing vessel to be removed prior to the moving of Vessel 1.  Had the operator take any of several maneuvers available they also could have avoided making contact with Vessel 2. The operator of Vessel 2 failed to adhere to Proper Lookout (33 CFR 83 Rule 5) and Actions to Avoid Collision (33 CFR 83 Rule 8)  by not observing for other vessels while underway and by failing to alter course by several available maneuevers available to avoid the vessels making contact.  
  