RedactedNarrative: ON 6/25/2016 AT APPROXIMATELY 5:30 PM, I ICO #1 AND ICO #2 RECEIVED A CALL FROM CARROLL COUNTY DISPATCH OF A BOATING ACCIDENT THAT HAD OCCURRED IN THE AREA OF WHITE OAKS ON LAKE FREEMAN.
  	MYSELF AND ICO #2 RESPONDED TO THE ACCIDENT BY BOAT AND ARRIVED ON SCENE SHORTLY AFTER EMS PERSONNEL ARRIVED ON SCENE. AS WE ARRIVED ON SCENE, EMS WAS TENDING TO A FEMALE SUBJECT, LATER IDENTIFIED AS VICTIM1. TWO OTHER SUBJECTS, LATER IDENTIFIED AS OPERATOR1 AND PASSENGER1 WERE ATTEMPTING TO DOCK THEIR BOAT. 
  	I APPROACHED OPERATOR1 AND ASKED IF HE HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT. OPERATOR1 STATED THAT HE WAS DRIVING THE BOAT (INxxxxxx) AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. I ASKED OPERATOR1 IF HE COULD EXPLAIN WHAT HAD HAPPENED DURING THE INCIDENT. OPERATOR1 STATED THAT THEY WERE TUBING AND MAKING A TURN AT APPROXIMATELY 20-25 MPH WHEN THE TUBE HIT A LARGE WAKE IN THE WATER. WHEN THE TUBE CROSSED OVER THE WAKE IT PUT A LOT OF PRESSURE ON THE TOW LINE AND DISCONNECTED IT FROM THE TUBE. AFTER THE TUBE DISCONNECTED FROM THE TOW LINE IT PROCEEDED TO FLOW TOWARDS THE BANK, STRIKING A NEARBY BOAT DOCK.
  	AT THIS POINT, I SPOKE WITH PASSENGER2 WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. PASSENGER2 STATED HE WAS A LITTLE SHOOK UP FROM THE ACCIDENT AND DID NOT QUITE KNOW ALL THE DETAILS. WHEN I ASKED HIM TO EXPLAIN WHAT HE KNOWS ABOUT IT, HE STATED THEY HAD BEEN TUBING, THE TUBE HIT A WAVE AND BROKE LOOSE FROM THE BOAT AND HIT A BOAT DOCK. I THEN ASKED PASSENGER2 IF ANYONE HAD BEEN CONSUMING ALCOHOL PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT. PASSENGER2 STATED THAT HE BELIEVED SOME OF THE BOAT OCCUPANTS HAD BEEN DRINKING EARLIER IN THE DAY.
  	I THEN SPOKE WITH PASSENGER1 ABOUT WHAT HAD HAPPENED. PASSENGER1 STATED THAT THEY WERE ALL HAVING A GOOD TIME TUBING AND THAT THEY WERE MAKING A TURN WHEN THE TUBE HIT A LARGE WAVE IN THE WATER. PASSENGER1 STATE SHE THOUGHT THE ROPE HAD BROKEN CAUSING THE TUBE TO HIT THE BOAT DOCK. PASSENGER1 DID NOT BELIEVE THE BOAT WAS TRAVELING AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED.
  	AT THIS POINT, VICTIM1 WAS TRANSPORTED TO IU HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOR POSSIBLE BACK INJURIES, WHERE SHE WAS THEN TRANSPORTED BY HELICOPTER TO ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL IN INDIANAPOLIS. NORA, VICTIM1'S MOTHER WENT WITH VICTIM1 IN THE AMBULANCE TO THE HOSPITAL.
  	AFTER VICTIM1 WAS TRANSPORTED FROM THE SCENE, I ASKED OPERATOR1 IF HE HAD ANY ALCOHOL TO DRINK THAT DAY. OPERATOR1 STATED THAT HE PROBABLY ONLY HAD TWO OR THREE DRINKS. I THEN ASKED OPERATOR1 IF HE WOULD TAKE A PBT FOR ME, OPERATOR1 STATED THAT HE WOULD. WHILE TRYING TO OBTAIN A PBT SAMPLE, OPERATOR1 GAVE AN INSUFFICIENT SAMPLE 3 TIMES.
  	AT THIS POINT, I ADVISED OPERATOR1 THAT WE WERE GOING TO DO SOME FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS INSTEAD. I WALKED OPERATOR1 UP TO THE NEARBY PARKING LOT WHERE IT WAS CLEARED OFF AND LEVEL. I THEN STARTED STANDARD FIELD SOBRIETY TESTING AT APPROXIMATELY 5:56 PM.
  	THE FIRST TEST I ADMINISTERED TO OPERATOR1 WAS THE HORIZONTAL GAZE NYSTAGMUS TEST. I ASKED OPERATOR1 TO REMOVE HIS SUNGLASSES AND OBSERVED HIS EYES WERE BLOOD SHOT AND GLAZED OVER. I THEN ASKED OPERATOR1 IF HE HAD ANY CONTACTS IN OR ANY HISTORY OF EYE PROBLEMS. OPERATOR1 STATED HE DID NOT HAVE CONTACTS IN OR HAVE HISTORY OF EYE PROBLEMS. OPERATOR1 DISPLAYED VERY APPARENT NYSTAGMUS IN BOTH EYES ON LACK OF SMOOTH PURSUIT, DISTINCT NYSTAGMUS AT MAXIMUM DEVIATION, AND ONSET OF NYSTAGMUS PRIOR TO 45 DEGREES. OPERATOR1 DISPLAYED ALL 6 CLUES IN THE HGN TEST.
  	I THEN ADMINISTERED THE ONE LEG STAND TEST. I READ OPERATOR1 THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TEST AND CONFIRMED HE UNDERSTOOD THE TEST. OPERATOR1 THEN STARTED THE ONE LEG STAND. AS HE PERFORMED THE TEST, OPERATOR1 HAD VERY POOR BALANCE, SWAYING FROM SIDE TO SIDE, HE PLACED HIS FOOT DOWN 5 TIMES DURING THE TEST, AND USED HIS ARMS TO BALANCE.
  	AFTER THE ONE LEG STAND I ASKED OPERATOR1 TO COMPLETE THE WALK AND TURN. AS I READ THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TEST AND PUT OPERATOR1 IN THE CORRECT POSITION, HE LOST BALANCE AND TRIED TO START WHILE I WAS STILL GIVING THE INSTRUCTIONS. DURING THE WALK AND TURN TEST, OPERATOR1 STOPPED SEVERAL TIMES TO STEADY HIMSELF, MISSED TOUCHING HEAL TO TOE ON ALMOST EVERY STEP, USED HIS ARMS TO BALANCE, MADE AN IMPROPER TURN, AND TOOK THE WRONG NUMBER OF STEPS AS HE WAS NOT COUNTING AFTER BEING INSTRUCTED TO DO SO. 
  	AT THIS POINT IN TIME, I READ OPERATOR1 THE IMPLIED CONSENT AND CONFIRMED HE UNDERSTOOD WHAT I HAD JUST READ TO HIM. OPERATOR1 THEN ADVISED HE WOULD CONSENT TO A CHEMICAL TEST. ICO #2 THEN CONTACTED CARROLL COUNTY DISPATCH TO HAVE AN OFFICER TRANSPORT OPERATOR1 TO THE JAIL FOR A CHEMICAL TEST. DEPUTY #1 ARRIVED ON SCENE AND TRANSPORTED OPERATOR1 TO THE JAIL. DEPUTY #1 THEN ADMINISTERED THE CERTIFIED CHEMICAL TEST. OPERATOR1'S RESULTS ON THE CHEMICAL TEST REGISTERED AS A 0.172% BAC.	
  	OPERATOR1 WAS BOOKED INTO THE CARROLL COUNTY JAIL ON CHARGES OF BOATING WHILE INTOXICATED CAUSING INJURY, BOATING WHILE INTOXICATED WITH A BAC 0.08% OR HIGHER, DANGEROUS OPERATION OF A MOTORBOAT, AND WAS ISSUED A CITATION FOR AN IDLE SPEED VIOLATION NEAR SHORELINE.
  