RedactedNarrative: 06/10/2022
  
  On this date, I was detailed to a vessel accident located at Sterling Harbor Bait and Tackle. Upon my arrival, I met with the reporting party. Subject1 is the manager of Sterling Harbor Bait and Tackle. Subject1 stated to the effect that operator1’s vessel struck the piling that belonged to Sterling Harbor Bait and Tackle and the vessel that was in the slip adjacent to the piling. 
  
  Subject1 stated the collision broke the piling and may possibly have caused damage to the vessel in the adjacent slip. Subject1 stated he did not see the collision. Subject1 stated to the effect that after Operator1 docked his vessel in it's slip which is located at the adjacent property, he confronted Operator1 about the damage done to the piling. At this time, Subject1 was unsure of any damage done to the docked vessel because he could not access the bow area to inspect for damage. Subject1 stated there were a total of four occupants including Operator1 on Operator1's vessel when he observed them dock the vessel, disembark and leave the property.
  
  It should be noted that Operator1 was not on scene and I was informed by Subject1 that Operator1 got into a vehicle and left the property. I gathered Subject1's statement and inquired if there were any other witnesses. Subject1 informed me a neighbor was a witness to the accident. 
  
  Witness stated to the effect he was at his vessel which was located at a nearby dock. Subject2 stated he observed Operator1's vessel attempting to pull into its slip bow first when it struck the piling with its starboard side causing the piling to break. I was able to make contact with Operator1 the following day via telephone. Operator1 stated to the effect he was docking the vessel when the engine stalled and he struck the piling in the neighbors slip. Operator1 admitted his vessel struck the piling and it broke in half. Operator1 stated he was confronted by Subject1 and informed Subject1 he would pay for the broken piling.
  