RedactedNarrative: On Monday morning of July 16th, I received a report of a boat accident at covered slips when dispatch asked a Ranger to pick up a witness statement. The Executive Services receptionist handed me the statement without providing much additional information.
  
  The witness statement stated that on July 15, 2015, an individual "was driving around the dock when he heard a crash and saw houseboat hitting houseboat in slip. They stopped looked at (their) boat, backed up and drove off."
  
  I received the statement, and at 1330 hours I started an investigation into the boat accident and returned to Executive Services.
  Captain and the Executive Services receptionist both told me that they had seen the damage inflicted upon houseboat V2, and while it wasn't critically damaged, it was very noticeable, and that V1 had left covered slips.
  
  At 1350 hours I met with V2 operator, and he stated that the V2 had been moored in its slip during the day of the accident. He showed me the damage from the accident and I documented and photographed the damage to the houseboat's stern and starboard sections. I found that the swim platform was bent downward on the starboard stern corner, with the starboard stern deck cleat on the swim platform twisted inward from its regular position, and with one of the sides of the cleat broken off. It appeared that one of the bolts that held the cleat in its regular position was sheared off. Damage was also apparent to the swim platform's decking rug, as well as the rubber corner bumper and bumper pads along the starboard stern corner, and a crack in the hull was present. I completed the rest of the pertinent section of the boating accident report and then cleared from the scene.
  
  At 1430 hours, I talked to the witness who submitted the original witness statement, and clarified his statement. The witness saw the accident take place from the North launch ramp, while he was in a speedboat that he was attempting to dock. He confirmed that he saw the V1 especially as it had "roman numerals". He saw V1 was parallel with the stern of the V2.
  
  At 1505 hours, owner of boat hit called office to report that he estimated the cost of  the damage between $3000-5000.
  
  At 1510 hours, I called the primary owner of the V1 on file with Aramark Executive Services to inform them of the accident and get information. No contact was made and I left them a voice mail requesting the call back.
  
  On July 19th, I was informed by Aramark Executive Services that the V1 was back at its slip at covered slips. I arrived at v1’s slip at 1239, and interviewed the current operator of the vessel. The operator stated that he had just received the vessel from the previous operator, and that he had no knowledge of a boat accident. I observed the bow of V1 and noted many examples of damage to the wood and synthetic bumpers. When I asked Subject about this damage, he stated that he had purchased the vessel with the damage. After further examination, I could not find any damage that appeared noticeably recent. Subject informed that the previous operator was a Subject2, and that he was a new part owner of the houseboat V1, and that he had just returned the boat from his first time taking it out on the lake. I concluded the interview with Subject and left the covered slips.
  
  On July 23rd, I had a phone conversation with Subject2 that started at 1320 hours. When I called Subject2 and introduced myself, his first statement was "Is this about the boat I hit?" I continued the conversation by asking him about what happened. He stated, "I hit that other houseboat" and Subject2 that he lifted a child to his lap to put a captain's hat on the child's head, and for a second, he took his attention away from operating the V1, and that's when he "clipped stern of houseboat (V2)." Subject2 said that the impact between his boat V1 and V2 occurred at his bow starboard bumper and the stern starboard of the V2's swim platform. Subject2 stated that he was traveling