RedactedNarrative: 1 was Docked @ New Peachtree Landing. Unit 1 had no one on board. Unit 2 launched from landing and backed into the bow of unit 1 causing the boat to hit the dock and chip the gel coat of unit 1. Operator of Unit 2 states that he never hit unit 1 but that his wake caused from unit 2 launching caused unit 1 to hit his wake caused from unit 2 launching caused unit 1 to hit the dock causing the damage. After taking statements and reviewing the damage to Unit 1, R/O is unable to determine what exactly caused the damage to Unit 1. R/O was given conflicting statements from witnesses. Unit 1 does have damage consistent being pushed against the floating dock. Investigation led R/O to investigate any damage on Unit 2 but R/O was unable to find any damage consistent with backing into Unit 1. Operator of Unit 2 however did admit to R/O that he believes that his wake from backing the boat caused the damage and accepts responsibility. R/O believes that witnesses were close to incident and heard the boat hit the dock causing the loud noise and causing damage to the Unit 1 and that unit 2 was so close to unit 1 that it may have appeared to them to have hit Unit 1, but without any damage to unit 2 it is impossible to say with confidence that unit 2 hit unit 1.