RedactedNarrative: In early July, an occupant aboard houseboat reported that she had witnessed a vessel accident to Ranger. Subject state that on either July 1st of 2nd, she witnessed a large white barge (belonging to and operated by concessionaire, Aramark) strike the port side of a houseboat near the bow. She observed that the impact caused a large dent in the solid metal wall located beneath the railing. The vessels were parked at the end of the A/C Dock, bow to bow. Subject further stated that another barge working in the area of struck boat then struck a protective piece of rubber/plastic and ripped it off a vertical post.
  
  Based on this report, Ranger followed up with Captain, Director of Marina Operations. Captain stated that Aramark Harbor Maintenance crews had been working in the vicinity of Hall's Crossing Marina in early July. Captain stated that he would follow up with the crews to see whether any incidents/accidents that occurred had gone unreported. Captain later indicated that the crew was not aware of having struck any vessels while performing work in the marina.
  
  On July 15th, a different occupant reported to Ranger that he had observed new structural damage on the rear of the boat. Subject2 stated that the fiberglass was cracked around a structural support, and that the bolt attaching the support to the houseboat was broken off the hull. Subject2 said that he had spoken to other visitors in the marina and that they had informed him that a large, white barge operated by Aramark had apparently struck another boat.
  
  Rangers attempted to contact the owner of the striking boat regarding the accident report. Numerous attempts were made to reach Owner by phone over the course of several weeks. In mid-September, Ranger was able to contact Owner, who provided insurance information for the striking by email. Ranger sent Owner a photo of the damage that had been reported by the witness, but Owner indicated that the damage was from a previous incident and did not observe any new damage to his vessel. Owner further stated that he had last been aboard the striking vessel in either April or May.
  
  Based on statements collected and interviews conducted as part of this investigation, it was not possible to determine what vessels may have been struck by an Aramark maintenance barge, in addition to what damage may have occurred. Witness statements and photo logs for the vessel accident report are attached.