RedactedNarrative: On 09-21-2014 at about 1400 hours, my partner, Dep., and I responded to an unknown-injury boat crash involving two boats. The crash took place in Conkling Bay on Coeur d’ Alene Lake, right outside of Conkling Bay Marina. 
  
  On arrival, I contacted (D1) and his girl friend (P1). I noticed Operator1 was holding a bag of ice to his head; he informed me that he bumped his head on the windshield of his boat and that he was okay. I asked Operator1 if he wanted Medical, Operator1 refused Medical and said, “No, I’m okay.” I asked Operator1 what happened and he told me the following. They had just stopped wakeboarding with their son (P2) Son and decided to go into Conkling Bay Marina to watch the football game. As their boat got on plain (12-15MPH according to Operator1), all of a sudden they saw a large boat off their starboard side later identified as a 35 foot Stancraft. Operator1 struck the Stancraft on the starboard side bow with the port side bow of his 18 foot Seaswirl. Operator1 stated he was unable to react and avoid the crash due to it happing so fast. Operator1 stated that he never saw the other boat. Then both parties proceeded to Conkling Bay Marina. I had Operator1 fill out the Idaho Boating Accident Report form (IBAR) and had Operator1 and Wolters fill out Voluntary Statement Forms. 
  
  Dep.  contacted (D2) and (P3), the other parties involved. Dep. informed me that Operator2 was driving north, heading to Rockford Bay Marina, when all of a sudden Operator1’s 18 foot Seaswirl crashed into the starboard side of their boat leaving a large hole on the starboard side. Operator2 stated that she was unable to avoid the crash due to not seeing the other boat until they collided. Operator2 also stated that she never saw the other boat. Then both parties proceeded to Conkling Bay Marina. Dep. had Operator2 fill out the Idaho Boating Accident Report form (IBAR) and a Voluntary Statement Form. 
  
  I walked over to the other side of the Marina where both vessels were located. I observed an 18 foot Seaswirl with damage to the trim on the starboard side, the trim appeared to have popped off. I also observed damage to the side rail on the port side, the side rail was dented in and the middle bracket had broken off the boat. 
  
  I observed a 35 foot Stancraft with approximately a three foot wide by eight inch tall hole on the starboard side of the vessel. Dep. went inside the cabin of the Stancraft. He observed one of the support beams had splinted, and the cross member on the port side was pushed out and had caused approximately a one inch gap. 
  
  Dep. and I conducted Safety Inspections on both vessels involved. Dep. took photographs of both vessels and the photographs were later placed onto a CD and booked into evidence. 
  
  Operator1 and Operator2’s statements were consistent with the damage on both vessels. Based on the evidence and the statements from the passengers I believe that Operator1 was in violation of improper lookout IC 67-7025 Rule 5, Risk of Collision IC 67-7025 Rule 7, and action to avoid collision IC 67-7025 Rule 8. I also believe Operator2 failed to give way which is violation of IC 67-7025 Rule 16, risk of collision IC 67-7025 rule 7, and improper lookout IC 67-7025 rule 5. At this time nether party has been charged for any violation.