RedactedNarrative: Units 1 and 2 were cruising up lake toward Arues landing. Unit 1 operator said another PWC cut him off and he swerved to miss him and ran into Unit 2. The other PWC left the area and until unit 1 and 2 went to the ramp to take out. 
  
  The stories were conflicting on what actually occurred. Operator1 was the operator of unit 1.Unit one Is a yellow Yamaha XL 700. Operator2 was the operator of unit 2. Unit 2 is a blue Yamaha XL 700. Operator1 says on the phone interview that the boat ramp that they were taking out was on the left which would put them going down the lake. Operator2 advised it was on the right which would have them going up the lake. Subject and Operator2 advised that there were a red and blue ski involved in the incident. Both Operators advise that one of the other vessels cut them off but neither can advise which color was the one that did so. Neither of the operators can advise if the other operators were male or female or the race of the operators. Both Operator1 and Operator2 advised that once the collision occurred that the other two pwc's left the area. 
  
  The operators of unit 1 & 2 were able to get both units back to the ramp and on a trailer. Based on the damage and transfer marks on units 1 & 2, Unit one was on the port side of unit 2. Unit 1damage was to starboard side and unit 2 had damage to the port side. The operators of units 1& 2 stated their speed was a little less than 40 mph and that they were travelling side by side 15- 20 feet apart. Unit one operator stated that when the unknown vessel cut in front of him he turned right to avoid the collision and ran in to unit 2. The operator of unit 1 stated that he had less than 10hours of experience and the operator of unit 2 stated he had less than 100 hours of experience. Based on the physical evidence on the units, the statements and Interviews there was fault to all parties involved. 
  
  Units 1 & 2 were in excessive speed in close proximity to each other to the point that neither were able to avoid the collision. Operators of units 1 & 2 to their own admission were inexperienced  on the water to the point to not avoid a dangerous situation with other operators on the lake In time to avoid the collision with each other. Both operators inattention of the traffic that they said caused the problem and each other was also a contributing factor. Units 1& 2 were travelling too fast at the distance they were apart and did not recognize the other operators they saw in time to avoid the incident with them or themselves. No cases were made to either of the units. Due to the lack of evidence on the unknown parties on the red or blue pwc's the Investigation on tracking them is unfounded.