RedactedNarrative: At approximately 2:45 p.m. we arrived at Fisherman''s Access where two personal watercraft (PWC) were at the boat launch.  I made contact with subject and he stated his girlfriend, Operator2 was injured in a two PWC collision.  
  
  Subject stated Operator2 was the operator and sole occupant of V2 and that he was operating another PWC nearby when the collision occurred.  Subject stated that he was just north of the Laughlin Bridge, mid channel, facing north and Operator2 was north of him facing south.  Subject stated that his PWC and V2 were idling at the time of the collision.  Subject stated Operator1 approached him from the south.  As Operator1 passed Subject, occupant of V1, fell off the PWC.  Subject stated Operator1 collided with the right side of V2, knocking Operator2 off of V2.
  
  I contacted Operator1 who stated he was operating V1 at approximately 40-45 mph.  Operator1 stated V1occupant fell off of V1 while heading north near Laughlin Bridge during a turn.  Operator1 stated he looked back to make sure V1occupant was okay and when he looked forward V2 was directly in front of him.  Operator1 stated he attempted to turn to avoid collision with V2 but V2 was too close and he impacted the left side of V2. Damage on V1 was identified as minor scratches on the underside of V1 on the port side of the bow eye.  Damage on the starboard stern corner of V1 occurred prior to the collision with V2 according to statements made by Operator1 and V1occupant.  Damage was estimated at $100.  Photographs of V1 were taken (attached).  Damage on V2 was identified as fiberglass damage on the starboard side of the bow, a missing right mirror, scraped and cracked starboard side of the bow compartment, scraped starboard side near the stern, and a cracked console.  Damage was estimated at $3500.  Photographs of V2 were taken (attached).
  
  I administered a preliminary horizontal gaze nystagmus test on Operator1 in which I noticed 3 out of a possible 6 clues, indicating he was likely under the influence of alcohol.  Warden administered a preliminary breath test (PBT).  Operator1 provided a breath sample that gave a reading of .069 BAC.  Operator1 then stated he had consumed two beers during the day.  Operator1 was placed under arrest and transported to Tucker Holding Facility.  An evidentiary breath test was conducted using an Intoxilyzer 8000 breath test machine.  Operator1 supplied two breath samples with readings of .055 BAC and .056 BAC, respectively.  Operator1 was booked for Operation of a Vessel while Intoxicated/Negligent Operation (NRS 488.400), violation of Rule 5, 6, and 8 (look out, safe speed, and action to avoid collision) of the United States Coast Guard Inland Navigation Rules (adopted under NRS 488.540), and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverage by Minor (NRS 202.020).
  
  I contacted Operator2 at WARMC at approximately 6:00 p.m. and she stated she was facing south on V2 north of the Laughlin Bridge when the collision occurred.  She stated that V1 was swerving left and right as V1 approached V2 and she did not know which way V1 was going to go.  Operator2 stated she turned to the left to avoid collision with V1 but V1 turned into her and knocked her off of V2.  Operator2 was unsure how fast V1 was traveling when it impacted V2.  Operator2 had a contusion on her right arm and a right pelvic fracture.  Damage and injuries appeared consistent with an impact to the starboard side of V2 by V1 at a near head-on impact.  This is contrary to statements made by both Operator1 who indicated an impact to the port side of V2 and Subject who indicated an impact near perpendicular to V2.  It appeared as though V1 impacted the starboard side of V2''…